How WRA Saved $200,000+ in External Recruiting Fees
WRA has reported saving more than $200,000 in external recruiting fees through its work with AECIQ. This case study summarizes the verified result and the recruiting model behind it without adding unverified performance claims.
Book a 15–20 Minute DemoThe recruiting cost problem
AEC firms often need experienced professionals who are already employed and difficult to reach through traditional applicant channels. When hiring needs repeat across multiple roles, external recruiting fees can become a significant expense.
The AECIQ approach
AECIQ combines talent-market research, human verification and confidential outreach. Employers define the criteria, review the researched prospects and choose whom AECIQ should approach.
Want to see how this works for your hiring team?
AECIQ can show you how passive-market research and confidential outreach would apply to your current hiring needs.
Book a 15–20 Minute DemoThe verified result
WRA reported saving more than $200,000 in external recruiting fees through its work with AECIQ.
Why the model can change recruiting economics
AECIQ does not charge a placement fee when a customer makes a hire. For organizations with recurring hiring needs, that creates a different cost structure from models where fees rise with every successful placement.
What we are not claiming
Hiring outcomes vary by role, geography, market conditions and employer process. This page intentionally limits itself to the verified WRA savings statement rather than adding unsupported hiring-volume or performance claims.
Ready to explore this for your firm?
See how AECIQ can help your team research the passive AEC talent market, prioritize prospects and run confidential outreach without placement fees.
Book a 15–20 Minute Demo